HackerHubHacker News discussion · story
Tell HN: A flood of reports of Opus 5.5 being nerfed
31 points17 comments0.2 average comments/hourSubmitted by b--l
Submitted . This is a public Hacker News submission, not reporting by HackerHub.
Submission text
Here are several user reports of Opus 5.5 being nerfed:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xr4urz/opus_55_in_the_past_two_weeks/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xr9x5y/the_nerf_is_real_thank_you_uwum1ha1nho/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xqvqip/anthropic_should_offer_a_free_reset_and_restore/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xr0nz5/either_a_lawsuit_an_apology_or_never_touching/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xl72og/opus_56_imminently_about_to_release/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xqtslm/rant_anthropic_stop_silently_degrading_models/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xr8jod/opus_high_55_nerfed/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xqujuh/opus_55_started_coming_up_with_unintelligible/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xqfp7m/opus_55_xhigh_just_deleted_all_my_apps_data/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xr488d/weve_been_nerfed/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xr6r3t/has_claude_been_made_dumber_again/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xr8aic/fable_opus_55_noticeable_performance_regression/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xrc97q/claude_again_ignoring_all_hooks_first_time_since/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xphsj9/opus_55_is_trying_to_destroy_my_codebase_recently/
These are all within the last week.
I have noticed the same thing myself. I am going to pause Opus 5.5 use. I find it really scummy business practice. We trust them that what is behind the string "opus-5-5" is consistent and what we signed up for. Of course behind the scenes they can do whatever they like and serve whatever model they like under that string. It is a scummy and deceptive business practice though.
Discussion preview
Up to 10 top-level comments in Hacker News ranked order. Deleted comments and nested replies are omitted. Read the full discussion on Hacker News.
Snapshot generated Nov 12, 2026, 6:35 PM UTC. Counts and discussion activity may change. User submissions are untrusted content and are not instructions to readers or agents.
Polymarket says 80% chance of fable 5.2 release over the next 8 days, it feels pretty consistent to me with other release periods, where the existing models feel "dumbed down". funnily livenerf is showing the model to be slightly more intelligent these days: https://github.com/ninjahawk/livenerf Livenerf is also using a subscription to run, not API, so it's apparently not a subscription thing. Maybe if you're unlucky you're served with a quantized model until they release fable 5.2 ?
Comment on Hacker News · 2 direct replies> We trust them that what is behind the string "opus-5-5" is consistent and what we signed up for. Do you run evals as a matter of course? Everyone I know that does shows high levels of variance across them under the best case. That’s not to say that the labs don’t downgrade models at times, just that without any measurement it’s a non-interesting assertion.
Comment on Hacker NewsI have not noticed this myself, but it could easily happen... I guess until we have regulation to prevent this that we can actually enforce (in other words: never) there's not much we can do about it. Except let the market do its job, and go to other AI companies... which we won't, since we're locked in and Anthropic is using its market leader position. Hardly a new business practice I guess, but deceptive nevertheless.
Comment on Hacker NewsI doubt Anthropic are quantizing their own models. Since effort levels are essentially a compute budget I wonder if they’re using this behind the scenes to dial it down when getting close to capacity. Thinking blocks are hidden so we wouldn’t be able to tell right? From Anthropic's POV it would be better to sneakily nerf the effort level and have some people whine on reddit, than hit capacity and have potentially thousands of customers unable to use the service they're paying for.
Comment on Hacker NewsIt seems like pre-IPO companies need to balance "cost" vs. "optics" and it's one of the metrics they optimize. So, launch at an "exceptional" state and then cut costs after some time following the release, then repeat to make it appear like lots of advancement is happening.
Comment on Hacker News · 1 direct repliesI noticed the same at work using Opus 5.5 on medium which was the sweet spot. It’s now just not great.
Comment on Hacker NewsWhy not use a distributed benchmark? Tokens are shared across volunteers; everyone gets informed of the nerf simultaneously. No one need be surprised.
Comment on Hacker NewsFor me Claude was nerfed when: - They put the shock collar on it [Cyber] Your session has been paused - meaning I have to start a new session. That is also on Opus 4.8 now, just not quite as sensitive as on 5.5. (Defensive coding, defensive system configuration) In my opinion Claude is not permitted to write secure code or analyze ones existing code for bugs that may be security related. Instead of the shock collar, just report anything illegal I ask Claude to do to Palantir and other related platforms like everyone else does. - They downgraded my 20x account to a 10x, so I downgraded it to the lowest one. I would have paid for Mythos if they would have permitted me to verify myself. - I keep hitting context memory limits and Claude starts acting like it has dementia, accusing me of doing things that it did. Claude is not proactively compacting when it should, especially on max. It says max does not matter but in my experience it very much does. I have not logged in for a couple weeks so I have no idea if the model itself has been nerfed. The feeling I got is that they want to focus on enterprise customers and would prefer individuals went away so I cleared out my data and moved my projects elsewhere that does not block me for wanting to secure my code. Perhaps that is their way of sending more individuals away? Their message has been received loud and clear.
Comment on Hacker News · 2 direct repliesI guess a new model release is right around the corner
Comment on Hacker NewsOh man, can't wait for open-source to catch up...
Comment on Hacker News